Big day in cosmology.

Again, Einstein continues to have the last laugh. On Aug. 14 2006, NASA annouced that they observed a collision of two large clusters using Chandra X-ray Observatory which provides direct supporting evidence of the existence of dark matter.

"Astronomers have come to the humbling conclusion that most of the matter in the universe, approximately 80 percent, is in the form of dark matter. Humbling because they do not know what it is. The two known types of dark matter, massive neutrinos and black holes, are thought to be a minor portion of the overall dark matter budget."

"These results are so surprising that some astronomers who accept and even contribute to this work have called the universe "preposterous" or "extravagant." In the opposite camp is a small, but passionate, group of astronomers who think there are serious flaws in the currently accepted cosmology." Therefore, they suggested changes to the theory of gravity, i.e. Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND), which make it stronger than predicated by Newton and Einstein on intergalactic scales.

Personally, I would like to see the dark matter theory to win, because of my belief that the foundamental theory that governs our universe should be concise and elegent, instead of piece wise function like. But we never know, just like general relativity replaced Newton's theory, and quantum mechanics complementing general relativity.

One way to decide between these two competing theories, dark matter vs. MOND, is to find a system where normal matter is seperated from dark matter. If dark matter does exist, we should be able to see the gravitational field distorted solely by the dark matter. The observed collision provided just such an opportunity. In a collision between two clusters, normal matter exerts a drag force, similar to air resistence, thus slows down itself. In contrast dark matter should not slow down because it doesn't interact directly with itself or the normal matter except through gravity.

For a detailed explaination, see Cosmic Variance.

A brilliant scientific history book on astrophysics.

You rarely find a scientific history book this addictive. Once you pick it up, expect to spend the next a couple of days on it.

In "Black Holes & Time Warps, Einstein's Outrageous Legacy.", Dr. Kip Thorne not only gives us a general introduction to theory of relativity, quantum mechanics and many other topics in astrophysics, he also vividly tells the story of scientists' exploration and struggle in the course of finding the truth of the universe.

What is lacking in education can be made up in numbers. Really?

Shelly Batts mentioned an interest link on her blog, China Stem Cells. To me, this particular organization is merely another instance of globalized health care industry. There is nothing really interesting. However, there is a paragraph on their Q&A page that, as a native Chinese, I am not quite sure how to take.

Q:"Aren’t the research standards in China not at the same levels as in the west?"

A: "... Also, because of the affordability of hiring educated researchers in China, what is lacking in education can be made up in numbers. ..."

Seriously, I can't believe someone so baldly put these words in their statement.

Interesting article about logging.

Logging, a seemingly trivial part of a software system, turns out to have a lot more into it.

Logging on with KV: "I am amazed at the number of people who go to great lengths to encrypt data but then just chuck it all, unceremoniously, in plain form, into the logs."

Key ideas:
1. Know what data need to be blinded, what need to be encrypted, what can just be left open.
2. Make sure the log itself isn't tampered, including signing both the entries and the log itself.
All generalizations are dangerous, even this one.
Alexandre Dumas
French dramatist & novelist (1802 - 1870)